F.M.L - Really??? Running Deuces????

[Pakman]

($138) UTG+1 Open $8 < Middle Age Conservative Man
($400) UTG+2 Call < Random Station Luckbox
($500) MP1 Call < Reg TAG
($400) MP2 Call < Reg LAG
($300) BTN Call < Super Str8 Fwd Station Old Lady
($288) BB (Me) Call with Jc9c

Pot = $48

Flop - KQTr

BB (Me) Led $25
UTG+1 Call
UTG+2 Call
MP1 Call
MP2 Fold
BTN Call

Pot = $173

Turn - KQT2

BB (Me) CB $125
UTG+1 Call AI
UTG+2 Call
MP1 Fold
BTN Call

Pot = $653

River - KQT22

BB (Me) CB $130
UTG+1 AI
UTG+2 AI
BTN AI

Pot = $1,067

BB (Me) J9
UTG+1 QQ
UTG+2 K2
BTN TT

This is the dumbest way I've ever lost a pot!!!! < Mega Tilt

[Journeyman_1]

thats frickin hilarious imo. i bet the K2 guy was sure he wins too!

pretty unlucky for you obv but it happens.

[5carab]

Wow... how didn't the money get in earlier. A straight vs. 2 sets and no one raised... Live poker is dead!

[Hughes4]

You deserve it

[Pakman]

Originally Posted by Journeyman_1

thats frickin hilarious imo. i bet the K2 guy was sure he wins too!

pretty unlucky for you obv but it happens.

He was after he spiked the deuce on the river.

I was unlucky to lose the main pot, but the more I think about it the more I think the river should of been a CKF. My VB shove was pretty spewey

[a10fouru]

Originally Posted by Pakman

He was after he spiked the deuce on the river.

I was unlucky to lose the main pot, but the more I think about it the more I think the river should of been a CKF. My VB shove was pretty spewey

I don't think so. you're getting called by many 2 pr hands. You should play a range..at least at 1/2 & 2/5... where you valueown yourself from time to time

[Pakman]

Originally Posted by a10fouru

I don't think so. you're getting called by many 2 pr hands. You should play a range..at least at 1/2 & 2/5... where you valueown yourself from time to time

There really isn't that many 2pr hands left.

I knew UTG1 had KK,QQ, and suspect UTG2 had 2 pair on the turn because of the read I got + the amount of time it took for him to call. I had just thought that it was KQ,KT,(Possibly KJ,QJ,JT) not K2. If I take all those cards out of the deck, there just isn't enough 2pr combos I beat vs BTN who may still have AJ or same hand as me J9 to make my shove +ev.

Vs one of them I for sure lose value by not shoving, but I can't shove vs both of them is what I'm thinking.

[5carab]

Ok, I'm not gonna lie, if I haven't been raised prior to the river, I assume that they do not have sets and therefore figure my hand is the stone f***ing nuts. I would value-shove here without question and be stunned not to win the pot, even if called. Nits ITT.

[The 6th Wilbury]

Originally Posted by 5carab

Ok, I'm not gonna lie, if I haven't been raised prior to the river, I assume that they do not have sets and therefore figure my hand is the stone f***ing nuts. I would value-shove here without question and be stunned not to win the pot, even if called. Nits ITT.

More accurately, nit (singular) ITT. Only Pakman questions the shove on the river, which is odd because I can't imagine check/folding for $130 more with the pot being what it is. Everyone else appears to agree that he did nothing wrong on the end.

While we're now talking about this hand strategically (sorry, Escalante), is it wrong that I would bet more on the flop? Betting just $25 seems to be surrendering value given how many people could easily have pair + straight draw type hands.

[Agent ]-[arbinger]

Originally Posted by The 6th Wilbury

While we're now talking about this hand strategically (sorry, Escalante), is it wrong that I would bet more on the flop? Betting just $25 seems to be surrendering value given how many people could easily have pair + straight draw type hands.

Given 5 villians I can easily see a pot sized raise here. Could also see myself check raising here alot as well.

]-[